| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The skipcleanup and failcleanup tests were actually testing skip and
fail in cleanupTestCase(), not in cleanup(). Add almost-duplicate
tests and clean up so that we now have {fail,skip}cleanup(,testcase}
tests to cover all four cases. Generated expected output. The new
tests (with old names) get their fail or skip - during cleanup() -
reported against the test instead of the cleanupTestCase function.
(Results for {init,cleanup}TestCase() are always reported, even when
these slots are not defined, as no-op passes.)
Pick-to: 6.4
Change-Id: I0988d1696b50c0e2f30c45ddc25e1bd0bfd2151a
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
|
|
|
The Test Anything Protocol (TAP), was originally Perl's simple text-based
interface between testing modules and test harnesses, but has since been
adopted by a large number of producers and consumers in many different
languages, which allows colorizing and summarizing test results.
The format is very simple:
TAP version 13
ok 1 - test description
not ok 2 - test description
---
message: 'Failure message'
severity: fail
expected: 123
actual: 456
...
ok 3 - test description # SKIP
1..3
The specification [1] is very brief, so the implementation has been
based on how typical consumers behave, especially when it comes to
the undefined diagnostics block.
[1] http://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html
Change-Id: I616e802ea380165c678510e940ddc6607d39c92d
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
|
