| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove the qmake project files for most of Qt.
Leave the qmake project files for examples, because we still test those
in the CI to ensure qmake does not regress.
Also leave the qmake project files for utils and other minor parts that
lack CMake project files.
Task-number: QTBUG-88742
Change-Id: I6cdf059e6204816f617f9624f3ea9822703f73cc
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Kai Koehne <kai.koehne@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Based on Asmo Saarela's advice (QTPM-686), adapted on advice from
FrogLogic support and converted to a feature so that the selftest and
testlib qmake config can be co-ordinated.
Task-number: QTPM-1385
Change-Id: Icd706f086009e1e08b3f8c5cd553f792402e28c0
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: Id67ab0ea3be47d3b365aa01a354829b8745b7250
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@digia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Qt 5.0 beta requires changing the default to the 5.0 API, disabling
the deprecated code. However, tests should test (and often do) the
compatibility API too, so turn it back on.
Task-number: QTBUG-25053
Change-Id: I8129c3ef3cb58541c95a32d083850d9e7f768927
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- All subprograms installed as part of test instead of separate installs
- Added installTestHelperApp() to testcase.prf
Change-Id: I02fbbb299f095054c9216ad0e5f91f574fb0fe3d
Reviewed-by: Kurt Korbatits <kurt.korbatits@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Changed to use QT_INSTALL_TESTS to install subtests.
Change-Id: I4a2a7bd2d3e7d6da34dbb922bf377bee98cdedb0
Reviewed-by: Kurt Korbatits <kurt.korbatits@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test uses qt.conf to enforce a predictable tests install location.
This was not working in the shadow build case, as qt.conf was only
present in the source tree; embed it as a resource at :/qt/etc/qt.conf
so it works in the shadow build case too.
Change-Id: Iec708d9686c29a1fc5ff0020dc11a93a593d20c5
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
|
|
|
Automated tests often need to load some data from external files.
Currently, a wide variety of approaches for this have been used in Qt
autotests, including:
- embed the source directory into the test binary at compile time, and
find the testdata relative to that; this fails when the source tree
is no longer available (e.g. when the tests are deployed to a device).
- use a path relative to the current working directory, and trust that
the caller always sets the current working directory such that the
testdata can be found; this fails when the caller uses a different
working directory than expected.
- use a path relative to QCoreApplication::applicationDirPath();
this fails when source tree != build tree (since testdata is not
automatically copied into the build tree).
- compile the files into the binary using the Qt resource system; this
should work, but does not allow for testing of code which genuinely
needs external files.
It seems that there is not a simple method for determining the testdata
path which can be reliably used in all circumstances, so various tests
have reinvented the testdata location method in different ways.
Therefore, this is a good candidate for an addition to the testlib API.
The current implementation of QFINDTESTDATA is able to find testdata
in all three of (build tree, install tree, source tree), in that order.
Change-Id: Ib2fed860723ccf437240da3b00db22dfe1a6b56c
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
|
