aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/auto/qml/qjsengine
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIvan Tkachenko <me@ratijas.tk>2023-02-20 03:30:37 +0300
committerIvan Tkachenko <me@ratijas.tk>2023-02-22 18:21:09 +0300
commit4c930247e67ecad383aa7e8d9a3308b38629bef8 (patch)
tree4aca9540a12fbd01f7a57db1232bef562134d8e2 /tests/auto/qml/qjsengine
parentc769e1a8db9a5762bb80cbc34473ec48a670a038 (diff)
Set correct `this` value in JSON.stringify replacer scope
Long story short, JSON.stringify takes optional second argument which can be a replacer function. It is supposed to be called for each encountered key-value during serialization. While replacer's second argument is already serialized (so you could just return it), just in case you are not satisfied with default serialization — the original value is still passed in together with the whole object as a value of JavaScript `this`. Sadly, there is no test in the whole ECMA test suite to catch this bug. This is quite a breaking change for code which already uses Qt-specific workarounds, so it would be better not to cherry-pick it as a hot-fix onto existing (released) branches. Sample use case: serialize dates as a number of seconds since epoch. function replacer(k, v) { if (this[k] instanceof Date) { return Math.floor(this[k].getTime() / 1000.0); } return v; } const str = JSON.stringify(obj, replacer); [ChangeLog][QML][Important Behavior Changes] Set correct `this` value in JSON.stringify replacer scope, so that the value for current key in current object is no longer pre-stringified, and can actually be used to implement custom object serialization logic. Fixes: QTBUG-95324 Pick-to: 6.5 Change-Id: I618a533e8eba7999d5416aca14f4971093a83f7a Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/auto/qml/qjsengine')
-rw-r--r--tests/auto/qml/qjsengine/tst_qjsengine.cpp59
1 files changed, 57 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/tests/auto/qml/qjsengine/tst_qjsengine.cpp b/tests/auto/qml/qjsengine/tst_qjsengine.cpp
index 21f4ff033b..3106a7a383 100644
--- a/tests/auto/qml/qjsengine/tst_qjsengine.cpp
+++ b/tests/auto/qml/qjsengine/tst_qjsengine.cpp
@@ -136,7 +136,10 @@ private slots:
void reentrancy_Array();
void reentrancy_objectCreation();
void jsIncDecNonObjectProperty();
- void JSONparse();
+ void JSON_Parse();
+ void JSON_Stringify_data();
+ void JSON_Stringify();
+ void JSON_Stringify_WithReplacer_QTBUG_95324();
void arraySort();
void lookupOnDisappearingProperty();
void arrayConcat();
@@ -3305,13 +3308,65 @@ void tst_QJSEngine::jsIncDecNonObjectProperty()
}
}
-void tst_QJSEngine::JSONparse()
+void tst_QJSEngine::JSON_Parse()
{
QJSEngine eng;
QJSValue ret = eng.evaluate("var json=\"{\\\"1\\\": null}\"; JSON.parse(json);");
QVERIFY(ret.isObject());
}
+void tst_QJSEngine::JSON_Stringify_data()
+{
+ QTest::addColumn<QString>("object");
+ QTest::addColumn<QString>("json");
+
+ // Basic "smoke" test. More tests are provided by test262 suite.
+ // Don't test with multiple key-value pairs on the same level,
+ // because serialization order might not be deterministic.
+ // Note: parenthesis are required, otherwise objects will be interpretted as code blocks.
+ QTest::newRow("empty") << "({})" << "{}";
+ QTest::newRow("string") << "({a: 'b'})" << "{\"a\":\"b\"}";
+ QTest::newRow("number") << "({c: 42})" << "{\"c\":42}";
+ QTest::newRow("boolean") << "({d: true})" << "{\"d\":true}";
+ QTest::newRow("key is array") << "({[[12, 34]]: 56})" << "{\"12,34\":56}";
+ QTest::newRow("value is date") << "({d: new Date('2000-01-20T12:00:00.000Z')})" << "{\"d\":\"2000-01-20T12:00:00.000Z\"}";
+}
+
+void tst_QJSEngine::JSON_Stringify()
+{
+ QFETCH(QString, object);
+ QFETCH(QString, json);
+
+ QJSEngine eng;
+
+ QJSValue obj = eng.evaluate(object);
+ QVERIFY(obj.isObject());
+
+ QJSValue func = eng.evaluate("(function(obj) { return JSON.stringify(obj); })");
+ QVERIFY(func.isCallable());
+
+ QJSValue ret = func.call(QJSValueList{obj});
+ QVERIFY(ret.isString());
+ QCOMPARE(ret.toString(), json);
+}
+
+void tst_QJSEngine::JSON_Stringify_WithReplacer_QTBUG_95324()
+{
+ QJSEngine eng;
+ QJSValue json = eng.evaluate(R"(
+ function replacer(k, v) {
+ if (this[k] instanceof Date) {
+ return Math.floor(this[k].getTime() / 1000.0);
+ }
+ return v;
+ }
+ const obj = {d: new Date('2000-01-20T12:00:00.000Z')};
+ JSON.stringify(obj, replacer);
+ )");
+ QVERIFY(json.isString());
+ QCOMPARE(json.toString(), QString::fromLatin1("{\"d\":948369600}"));
+}
+
void tst_QJSEngine::arraySort()
{
// tests that calling Array.sort with a bad sort function doesn't cause issues