summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/chromium/third_party/catapult/third_party/beautifulsoup4-4.9.3/scripts/demonstrate_parser_differences.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'chromium/third_party/catapult/third_party/beautifulsoup4-4.9.3/scripts/demonstrate_parser_differences.py')
-rw-r--r--chromium/third_party/catapult/third_party/beautifulsoup4-4.9.3/scripts/demonstrate_parser_differences.py95
1 files changed, 95 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/chromium/third_party/catapult/third_party/beautifulsoup4-4.9.3/scripts/demonstrate_parser_differences.py b/chromium/third_party/catapult/third_party/beautifulsoup4-4.9.3/scripts/demonstrate_parser_differences.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d84670a53a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/chromium/third_party/catapult/third_party/beautifulsoup4-4.9.3/scripts/demonstrate_parser_differences.py
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+"""Demonstrate how different parsers parse the same markup.
+
+Beautiful Soup can use any of a number of different parsers. Every
+parser should behave more or less the same on valid markup, and
+Beautiful Soup's unit tests make sure this is the case. But every
+parser handles invalid markup differently. Even different versions of
+the same parser handle invalid markup differently. So instead of unit
+tests I've created this educational demonstration script.
+
+The file demonstration_markup.txt contains many lines of HTML. This
+script tests each line of markup against every parser you have
+installed, and prints out how each parser sees that markup. This may
+help you choose a parser, or understand why Beautiful Soup presents
+your document the way it does.
+"""
+
+import os
+import sys
+from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
+parsers = ['html.parser']
+
+try:
+ from bs4.builder import _lxml
+ parsers.append('lxml')
+except ImportError, e:
+ pass
+
+try:
+ from bs4.builder import _html5lib
+ parsers.append('html5lib')
+except ImportError, e:
+ pass
+
+class Demonstration(object):
+ def __init__(self, markup):
+ self.results = {}
+ self.markup = markup
+
+ def run_against(self, *parser_names):
+ uniform_results = True
+ previous_output = None
+ for parser in parser_names:
+ try:
+ soup = BeautifulSoup(self.markup, parser)
+ if markup.startswith("<div>"):
+ # Extract the interesting part
+ output = soup.div
+ else:
+ output = soup
+ except Exception, e:
+ output = "[EXCEPTION] %s" % str(e)
+ self.results[parser] = output
+ if previous_output is None:
+ previous_output = output
+ elif previous_output != output:
+ uniform_results = False
+ return uniform_results
+
+ def dump(self):
+ print "%s: %s" % ("Markup".rjust(13), self.markup.encode("utf8"))
+ for parser, output in self.results.items():
+ print "%s: %s" % (parser.rjust(13), output.encode("utf8"))
+
+different_results = []
+uniform_results = []
+
+print "= Testing the following parsers: %s =" % ", ".join(parsers)
+print
+
+input_file = sys.stdin
+if sys.stdin.isatty():
+ for filename in [
+ "demonstration_markup.txt",
+ os.path.join("scripts", "demonstration_markup.txt")]:
+ if os.path.exists(filename):
+ input_file = open(filename)
+
+for markup in input_file:
+ demo = Demonstration(markup.decode("utf8").strip().replace("\\n", "\n"))
+ is_uniform = demo.run_against(*parsers)
+ if is_uniform:
+ uniform_results.append(demo)
+ else:
+ different_results.append(demo)
+
+print "== Markup that's handled the same in every parser =="
+print
+for demo in uniform_results:
+ demo.dump()
+ print
+print "== Markup that's not handled the same in every parser =="
+print
+for demo in different_results:
+ demo.dump()
+ print